October 23, 2018 Other Closed Access

Mohseni, Ehsan; Herrmann-Heber, Robert; Reinecke, Sebastian Felix; Hampel, Uwe

DataCite XML Export

<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<resource xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-4" xsi:schemaLocation="http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-4 http://schema.datacite.org/meta/kernel-4.1/metadata.xsd">
  <identifier identifierType="DOI">10.14278/rodare.64</identifier>
  <creators>
    <creator>
      <creatorName>Mohseni, Ehsan</creatorName>
      <givenName>Ehsan</givenName>
      <familyName>Mohseni</familyName>
      <nameIdentifier nameIdentifierScheme="ORCID" schemeURI="http://orcid.org/">0000-0002-5244-9892</nameIdentifier>
      <affiliation>Technische Universität Dresden</affiliation>
    </creator>
    <creator>
      <creatorName>Herrmann-Heber, Robert</creatorName>
      <givenName>Robert</givenName>
      <familyName>Herrmann-Heber</familyName>
      <affiliation>Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR)</affiliation>
    </creator>
    <creator>
      <creatorName>Reinecke, Sebastian Felix</creatorName>
      <givenName>Sebastian Felix</givenName>
      <familyName>Reinecke</familyName>
      <affiliation>Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR)</affiliation>
    </creator>
    <creator>
      <creatorName>Hampel, Uwe</creatorName>
      <givenName>Uwe</givenName>
      <familyName>Hampel</familyName>
      <affiliation>Technische Universität Dresden</affiliation>
    </creator>
  </creators>
  <titles>
    <title>Bubble Generation by Micro-Orifices with Application on Activated Sludge Wastewater Treatment</title>
  </titles>
  <publisher>Rodare</publisher>
  <publicationYear>2018</publicationYear>
  <subjects>
    <subject>Bubble Generation</subject>
    <subject>Micro-orifices</subject>
    <subject>Aeration</subject>
    <subject>Biological Wastewater Treatment</subject>
    <subject>Rubber Membrane Diffusers</subject>
    <subject>Oxygen Transfer</subject>
  </subjects>
  <dates>
    <date dateType="Issued">2018-10-23</date>
  </dates>
  <language>en</language>
  <resourceType resourceTypeGeneral="Other"/>
  <alternateIdentifiers>
    <alternateIdentifier alternateIdentifierType="url">https://rodare.hzdr.de/record/64</alternateIdentifier>
  </alternateIdentifiers>
  <relatedIdentifiers>
    <relatedIdentifier relatedIdentifierType="URL" relationType="IsIdenticalTo">https://www.hzdr.de/publications/Publ-28100</relatedIdentifier>
    <relatedIdentifier relatedIdentifierType="DOI" relationType="IsVersionOf">10.14278/rodare.63</relatedIdentifier>
    <relatedIdentifier relatedIdentifierType="URL" relationType="IsPartOf">https://rodare.hzdr.de/communities/fwd</relatedIdentifier>
    <relatedIdentifier relatedIdentifierType="URL" relationType="IsPartOf">https://rodare.hzdr.de/communities/rodare</relatedIdentifier>
    <relatedIdentifier relatedIdentifierType="URL" relationType="IsPartOf">https://rodare.hzdr.de/communities/topflow</relatedIdentifier>
  </relatedIdentifiers>
  <rightsList>
    <rights rightsURI="info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess">Closed Access</rights>
  </rightsList>
  <descriptions>
    <description descriptionType="Abstract">&lt;p&gt;We studied the initial gas dispersion performance of diffuser concepts based on micro-orifices and needles with very fine orifice diameters in the range from 30 &amp;micro;m to 200 &amp;micro;m, as such diffusers are currently in discussion for energy-efficient wastewater treatment plants. To evaluate the performance of these micro-orifices, we compared them with industrial rubber membrane diffusers with respect to Sauter mean bubble diameter, pressure drop, frequency of bubble formation, oxygen transfer rate, and power demand for air compression. Our study revealed that, in comparison with rubber membrane diffusers bubbles generated from the micro-orifices transfer up to 82% more oxygen content into the continuous phase at up to 75% less power demand. Moreover, these micro-orifices are able to produce bubble sizes in the same range as the needle diffusers at 60% less pressure drop and 60% higher bubble generation frequency. Therefore, we also expect an improvement in the oxygen transfer coefficient &lt;em&gt;K&lt;sub&gt;L&lt;/sub&gt;a&lt;/em&gt; and standard oxygen transfer efficiency &lt;em&gt;SOTE&lt;/em&gt; compared to commercial rubber membrane diffusers.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
  </descriptions>
</resource>