old beach, otherwise total unspecial point, difficult to tell by photos if mesic or sub-xeric, soil photos do not help here
old beach, otherwise total unspecial point, difficult to tell by photos if mesic or sub-xeric, soil photos do not help here
old beach, otherwise total unspecial point, difficult to tell by photos if mesic or sub-xeric, soil photos do not help here
old beach, otherwise total unspecial point, difficult to tell by photos if mesic or sub-xeric, soil photos do not help here
old beach, otherwise total unspecial point, difficult to tell by photos if mesic or sub-xeric, soil photos do not help here
old beach, otherwise total unspecial point, difficult to tell by photos if mesic or sub-xeric, soil photos do not help here
SAPROLITE!!!
SAPROLITE!!!
SAPROLITE!!!
SAPROLITE!!!
SAPROLITE!!!
SAPROLITE!!!
little moss on the photos
little moss on the photos
little moss on the photos
little moss on the photos
little moss on the photos
little moss on the photos
Labrador tea, definitely not very wet based on photos, soil photo looks dry, in between?
Labrador tea, definitely not very wet based on photos, soil photo looks dry, in between?
Labrador tea, definitely not very wet based on photos, soil photo looks dry, in between?
Labrador tea, definitely not very wet based on photos, soil photo looks dry, in between?
Labrador tea, definitely not very wet based on photos, soil photo looks dry, in between?
Labrador tea, definitely not very wet based on photos, soil photo looks dry, in between?
nothing special, although close to paludified are, not paludified in the spot, based on soil photos it could be also mesic, but definitely not peat
nothing special, although close to paludified are, not paludified in the spot, based on soil photos it could be also mesic, but definitely not peat
nothing special, although close to paludified are, not paludified in the spot, based on soil photos it could be also mesic, but definitely not peat
nothing special, although close to paludified are, not paludified in the spot, based on soil photos it could be also mesic, but definitely not peat
nothing special, although close to paludified are, not paludified in the spot, based on soil photos it could be also mesic, but definitely not peat
nothing special, although close to paludified are, not paludified in the spot, based on soil photos it could be also mesic, but definitely not peat
photos show wetland species, but also dry aspects, measurements are xeric, soil photos suggest sub-xeric
photos show wetland species, but also dry aspects, measurements are xeric, soil photos suggest sub-xeric
photos show wetland species, but also dry aspects, measurements are xeric, soil photos suggest sub-xeric
photos show wetland species, but also dry aspects, measurements are xeric, soil photos suggest sub-xeric
photos show wetland species, but also dry aspects, measurements are xeric, soil photos suggest sub-xeric
photos show wetland species, but also dry aspects, measurements are xeric, soil photos suggest sub-xeric
in the middle of a island surrounded by peat, dry soil pit backed up on photos and soil photos
in the middle of a island surrounded by peat, dry soil pit backed up on photos and soil photos
in the middle of a island surrounded by peat, dry soil pit backed up on photos and soil photos
in the middle of a island surrounded by peat, dry soil pit backed up on photos and soil photos
in the middle of a island surrounded by peat, dry soil pit backed up on photos and soil photos
in the middle of a island surrounded by peat, dry soil pit backed up on photos and soil photos
a lot of boulders, but between it looks dry
a lot of boulders, but between it looks dry
a lot of boulders, but between it looks dry
a lot of boulders, but between it looks dry
a lot of boulders, but between it looks dry
a lot of boulders, but between it looks dry
on the hill, light moss vegetation, but only moss
on the hill, light moss vegetation, but only moss
on the hill, light moss vegetation, but only moss
on the hill, light moss vegetation, but only moss
on the hill, light moss vegetation, but only moss
on the hill, light moss vegetation, but only moss
could also be sub-xeric, replicate point, one is nearly mesic (with very dark soil) and seond pit is sub-xeric
could also be sub-xeric, replicate point, one is nearly mesic (with very dark soil) and seond pit is sub-xeric
could also be sub-xeric, replicate point, one is nearly mesic (with very dark soil) and seond pit is sub-xeric
could also be sub-xeric, replicate point, one is nearly mesic (with very dark soil) and seond pit is sub-xeric
could also be sub-xeric, replicate point, one is nearly mesic (with very dark soil) and seond pit is sub-xeric
could also be sub-xeric, replicate point, one is nearly mesic (with very dark soil) and seond pit is sub-xeric
but very nutrient rich, no A-horizon, deep rooting (20 - 30 cm into the B-horizon) based on soil photo -> mesic?, is maybe even xeric, especially for the plants, alluvial layer is missing, between mesic and sub-xeric
but very nutrient rich, no A-horizon, deep rooting (20 - 30 cm into the B-horizon) based on soil photo -> mesic?, is maybe even xeric, especially for the plants, alluvial layer is missing, between mesic and sub-xeric
but very nutrient rich, no A-horizon, deep rooting (20 - 30 cm into the B-horizon) based on soil photo -> mesic?, is maybe even xeric, especially for the plants, alluvial layer is missing, between mesic and sub-xeric
but very nutrient rich, no A-horizon, deep rooting (20 - 30 cm into the B-horizon) based on soil photo -> mesic?, is maybe even xeric, especially for the plants, alluvial layer is missing, between mesic and sub-xeric
but very nutrient rich, no A-horizon, deep rooting (20 - 30 cm into the B-horizon) based on soil photo -> mesic?, is maybe even xeric, especially for the plants, alluvial layer is missing, between mesic and sub-xeric
but very nutrient rich, no A-horizon, deep rooting (20 - 30 cm into the B-horizon) based on soil photo -> mesic?, is maybe even xeric, especially for the plants, alluvial layer is missing, between mesic and sub-xeric
is maybe mesic for the soil, but for plants it is sub-xeric, based on soil photos mesic
is maybe mesic for the soil, but for plants it is sub-xeric, based on soil photos mesic
is maybe mesic for the soil, but for plants it is sub-xeric, based on soil photos mesic
is maybe mesic for the soil, but for plants it is sub-xeric, based on soil photos mesic
is maybe mesic for the soil, but for plants it is sub-xeric, based on soil photos mesic
is maybe mesic for the soil, but for plants it is sub-xeric, based on soil photos mesic
has Lukapodium, points sits in a small depresesion. But in case, it could also go to sub-xeric, soil photo shows very dark b-horizon, suggests mesic
has Lukapodium, points sits in a small depresesion. But in case, it could also go to sub-xeric, soil photo shows very dark b-horizon, suggests mesic
has Lukapodium, points sits in a small depresesion. But in case, it could also go to sub-xeric, soil photo shows very dark b-horizon, suggests mesic
has Lukapodium, points sits in a small depresesion. But in case, it could also go to sub-xeric, soil photo shows very dark b-horizon, suggests mesic
has Lukapodium, points sits in a small depresesion. But in case, it could also go to sub-xeric, soil photo shows very dark b-horizon, suggests mesic
has Lukapodium, points sits in a small depresesion. But in case, it could also go to sub-xeric, soil photo shows very dark b-horizon, suggests mesic
based on photos more mesic, but on dry side of mesic
based on photos more mesic, but on dry side of mesic
based on photos more mesic, but on dry side of mesic
based on photos more mesic, but on dry side of mesic
based on photos more mesic, but on dry side of mesic
based on photos more mesic, but on dry side of mesic
could be even peatland, soil photo shows “double soil layer”, maybe something in the environment has changed, so that a second layer of sediments came on top
could be even peatland, soil photo shows “double soil layer”, maybe something in the environment has changed, so that a second layer of sediments came on top
could be even peatland, soil photo shows “double soil layer”, maybe something in the environment has changed, so that a second layer of sediments came on top
could be even peatland, soil photo shows “double soil layer”, maybe something in the environment has changed, so that a second layer of sediments came on top
could be even peatland, soil photo shows “double soil layer”, maybe something in the environment has changed, so that a second layer of sediments came on top
could be even peatland, soil photo shows “double soil layer”, maybe something in the environment has changed, so that a second layer of sediments came on top
based on photos, it is on a ridge
based on photos, it is on a ridge
based on photos, it is on a ridge
based on photos, it is on a ridge
based on photos, it is on a ridge
based on photos, it is on a ridge
Lukapodium, Labrador tea, more mesic, no soil sample!
Lukapodium, Labrador tea, more mesic, no soil sample!
Lukapodium, Labrador tea, more mesic, no soil sample!
Lukapodium, Labrador tea, more mesic, no soil sample!
Lukapodium, Labrador tea, more mesic, no soil sample!
Lukapodium, Labrador tea, more mesic, no soil sample!
high above lake, otherwise not special
high above lake, otherwise not special
high above lake, otherwise not special
high above lake, otherwise not special
high above lake, otherwise not special
high above lake, otherwise not special
dry place
dry place
dry place
dry place
dry place
dry place
is close to peat, with ferns, weird soil photo, maybe this is peat, and we didn't sample the B-horizon but only the alluvial
is close to peat, with ferns, weird soil photo, maybe this is peat, and we didn't sample the B-horizon but only the alluvial
is close to peat, with ferns, weird soil photo, maybe this is peat, and we didn't sample the B-horizon but only the alluvial
is close to peat, with ferns, weird soil photo, maybe this is peat, and we didn't sample the B-horizon but only the alluvial
is close to peat, with ferns, weird soil photo, maybe this is peat, and we didn't sample the B-horizon but only the alluvial
is close to peat, with ferns, weird soil photo, maybe this is peat, and we didn't sample the B-horizon but only the alluvial
is maybe even xeric, sub-xeric by soil photo, dry place
is maybe even xeric, sub-xeric by soil photo, dry place
is maybe even xeric, sub-xeric by soil photo, dry place
is maybe even xeric, sub-xeric by soil photo, dry place
is maybe even xeric, sub-xeric by soil photo, dry place
is maybe even xeric, sub-xeric by soil photo, dry place
soil photo shows thick organic layer, close to peatish soil
soil photo shows thick organic layer, close to peatish soil
soil photo shows thick organic layer, close to peatish soil
soil photo shows thick organic layer, close to peatish soil
soil photo shows thick organic layer, close to peatish soil
soil photo shows thick organic layer, close to peatish soil
Labrabor tea, probably slightly peatish, based on soil photo sub-xeric
Labrabor tea, probably slightly peatish, based on soil photo sub-xeric
Labrabor tea, probably slightly peatish, based on soil photo sub-xeric
Labrabor tea, probably slightly peatish, based on soil photo sub-xeric
Labrabor tea, probably slightly peatish, based on soil photo sub-xeric
Labrabor tea, probably slightly peatish, based on soil photo sub-xeric
surrounded by mesic. Original polygon peat, but that's definitely wrong
surrounded by mesic. Original polygon peat, but that's definitely wrong
surrounded by mesic. Original polygon peat, but that's definitely wrong
surrounded by mesic. Original polygon peat, but that's definitely wrong
surrounded by mesic. Original polygon peat, but that's definitely wrong
surrounded by mesic. Original polygon peat, but that's definitely wrong
could also be mesic, soil photo shows an in-between case, likely sub-xeric
could also be mesic, soil photo shows an in-between case, likely sub-xeric
could also be mesic, soil photo shows an in-between case, likely sub-xeric
could also be mesic, soil photo shows an in-between case, likely sub-xeric
could also be mesic, soil photo shows an in-between case, likely sub-xeric
could also be mesic, soil photo shows an in-between case, likely sub-xeric
on a ridge
on a ridge
on a ridge
on a ridge
on a ridge
on a ridge
nothing special, mosses (mostly on the rocks) but no grasses, back-up by soil photo
nothing special, mosses (mostly on the rocks) but no grasses, back-up by soil photo
nothing special, mosses (mostly on the rocks) but no grasses, back-up by soil photo
nothing special, mosses (mostly on the rocks) but no grasses, back-up by soil photo
nothing special, mosses (mostly on the rocks) but no grasses, back-up by soil photo
nothing special, mosses (mostly on the rocks) but no grasses, back-up by soil photo
wettest class of mineral soil, very close to peat class, based on soil photos definitely mesic (not peat)
wettest class of mineral soil, very close to peat class, based on soil photos definitely mesic (not peat)
wettest class of mineral soil, very close to peat class, based on soil photos definitely mesic (not peat)
wettest class of mineral soil, very close to peat class, based on soil photos definitely mesic (not peat)
wettest class of mineral soil, very close to peat class, based on soil photos definitely mesic (not peat)
wettest class of mineral soil, very close to peat class, based on soil photos definitely mesic (not peat)
with Labrador tea and pines. So wet indicators and dry indicators. the compromise is sub-xeric, soil photo shows a very thick organic layer, maybe more mesic -> mesic
with Labrador tea and pines. So wet indicators and dry indicators. the compromise is sub-xeric, soil photo shows a very thick organic layer, maybe more mesic -> mesic
with Labrador tea and pines. So wet indicators and dry indicators. the compromise is sub-xeric, soil photo shows a very thick organic layer, maybe more mesic -> mesic
with Labrador tea and pines. So wet indicators and dry indicators. the compromise is sub-xeric, soil photo shows a very thick organic layer, maybe more mesic -> mesic
with Labrador tea and pines. So wet indicators and dry indicators. the compromise is sub-xeric, soil photo shows a very thick organic layer, maybe more mesic -> mesic
with Labrador tea and pines. So wet indicators and dry indicators. the compromise is sub-xeric, soil photo shows a very thick organic layer, maybe more mesic -> mesic
but could also be sub-xeric heath forest, soi photo suggests mesic by top, but the soil of B-horizon slightly points towards sub-xeric
but could also be sub-xeric heath forest, soi photo suggests mesic by top, but the soil of B-horizon slightly points towards sub-xeric
but could also be sub-xeric heath forest, soi photo suggests mesic by top, but the soil of B-horizon slightly points towards sub-xeric
but could also be sub-xeric heath forest, soi photo suggests mesic by top, but the soil of B-horizon slightly points towards sub-xeric
but could also be sub-xeric heath forest, soi photo suggests mesic by top, but the soil of B-horizon slightly points towards sub-xeric
but could also be sub-xeric heath forest, soi photo suggests mesic by top, but the soil of B-horizon slightly points towards sub-xeric
but could maybe also go to mesic due to dielectric. (moist sub-xeric place), but soil photos suggest more a sub-xeric point
but could maybe also go to mesic due to dielectric. (moist sub-xeric place), but soil photos suggest more a sub-xeric point
but could maybe also go to mesic due to dielectric. (moist sub-xeric place), but soil photos suggest more a sub-xeric point
but could maybe also go to mesic due to dielectric. (moist sub-xeric place), but soil photos suggest more a sub-xeric point
but could maybe also go to mesic due to dielectric. (moist sub-xeric place), but soil photos suggest more a sub-xeric point
but could maybe also go to mesic due to dielectric. (moist sub-xeric place), but soil photos suggest more a sub-xeric point
very nutrient rich! also back up by soil photos. this could be even peatland, definitely on the wet side
very nutrient rich! also back up by soil photos. this could be even peatland, definitely on the wet side
very nutrient rich! also back up by soil photos. this could be even peatland, definitely on the wet side
very nutrient rich! also back up by soil photos. this could be even peatland, definitely on the wet side
very nutrient rich! also back up by soil photos. this could be even peatland, definitely on the wet side
very nutrient rich! also back up by soil photos. this could be even peatland, definitely on the wet side
generally dry, but on the wet side of sub-xeric, maybe also nutrient rich
generally dry, but on the wet side of sub-xeric, maybe also nutrient rich
generally dry, but on the wet side of sub-xeric, maybe also nutrient rich
generally dry, but on the wet side of sub-xeric, maybe also nutrient rich
generally dry, but on the wet side of sub-xeric, maybe also nutrient rich
generally dry, but on the wet side of sub-xeric, maybe also nutrient rich
could also be xeric, very similar to 278, but it looks drier than 278, very nutrient rich spot, soil photo shows verys coarse soil
could also be xeric, very similar to 278, but it looks drier than 278, very nutrient rich spot, soil photo shows verys coarse soil
could also be xeric, very similar to 278, but it looks drier than 278, very nutrient rich spot, soil photo shows verys coarse soil
could also be xeric, very similar to 278, but it looks drier than 278, very nutrient rich spot, soil photo shows verys coarse soil
could also be xeric, very similar to 278, but it looks drier than 278, very nutrient rich spot, soil photo shows verys coarse soil
could also be xeric, very similar to 278, but it looks drier than 278, very nutrient rich spot, soil photo shows verys coarse soil
soil photo very dry
soil photo very dry
soil photo very dry
soil photo very dry
soil photo very dry
soil photo very dry
no soil photos
no soil photos
no soil photos
no soil photos
no soil photos
no soil photos
dry place, nothing special, no grasses or other wet-indicators
dry place, nothing special, no grasses or other wet-indicators
dry place, nothing special, no grasses or other wet-indicators
dry place, nothing special, no grasses or other wet-indicators
dry place, nothing special, no grasses or other wet-indicators
dry place, nothing special, no grasses or other wet-indicators
wettest class of mineral soil, spilling of peat north of it, probably flowing to south, based on soil photos mesic, but not peaty, water in the pit
wettest class of mineral soil, spilling of peat north of it, probably flowing to south, based on soil photos mesic, but not peaty, water in the pit
wettest class of mineral soil, spilling of peat north of it, probably flowing to south, based on soil photos mesic, but not peaty, water in the pit
wettest class of mineral soil, spilling of peat north of it, probably flowing to south, based on soil photos mesic, but not peaty, water in the pit
wettest class of mineral soil, spilling of peat north of it, probably flowing to south, based on soil photos mesic, but not peaty, water in the pit
wettest class of mineral soil, spilling of peat north of it, probably flowing to south, based on soil photos mesic, but not peaty, water in the pit
very nutrient rich, based on photos, it could maybe also put to mesic, but then the pit has no thick organic layer, which points to sub-xeric, soil photo also suggests sub-xeric
very nutrient rich, based on photos, it could maybe also put to mesic, but then the pit has no thick organic layer, which points to sub-xeric, soil photo also suggests sub-xeric
very nutrient rich, based on photos, it could maybe also put to mesic, but then the pit has no thick organic layer, which points to sub-xeric, soil photo also suggests sub-xeric
very nutrient rich, based on photos, it could maybe also put to mesic, but then the pit has no thick organic layer, which points to sub-xeric, soil photo also suggests sub-xeric
very nutrient rich, based on photos, it could maybe also put to mesic, but then the pit has no thick organic layer, which points to sub-xeric, soil photo also suggests sub-xeric
surface is more sub-xeric, i.e. for the plants, but for soils it would be rather mesic (based on dielectrics and conductivity), based on soil photos it is more sub-xeric
surface is more sub-xeric, i.e. for the plants, but for soils it would be rather mesic (based on dielectrics and conductivity), based on soil photos it is more sub-xeric
surface is more sub-xeric, i.e. for the plants, but for soils it would be rather mesic (based on dielectrics and conductivity), based on soil photos it is more sub-xeric
surface is more sub-xeric, i.e. for the plants, but for soils it would be rather mesic (based on dielectrics and conductivity), based on soil photos it is more sub-xeric
surface is more sub-xeric, i.e. for the plants, but for soils it would be rather mesic (based on dielectrics and conductivity), based on soil photos it is more sub-xeric
surface is more sub-xeric, i.e. for the plants, but for soils it would be rather mesic (based on dielectrics and conductivity), based on soil photos it is more sub-xeric
photos are showing, that the place is maybe more on the mesic side. soil photos suggest that it could also be on the mesic class
photos are showing, that the place is maybe more on the mesic side. soil photos suggest that it could also be on the mesic class
photos are showing, that the place is maybe more on the mesic side. soil photos suggest that it could also be on the mesic class
photos are showing, that the place is maybe more on the mesic side. soil photos suggest that it could also be on the mesic class
photos are showing, that the place is maybe more on the mesic side. soil photos suggest that it could also be on the mesic class
photos are showing, that the place is maybe more on the mesic side. soil photos suggest that it could also be on the mesic class
normal site, no wet-indicators
normal site, no wet-indicators
normal site, no wet-indicators
normal site, no wet-indicators
normal site, no wet-indicators
normal site, no wet-indicators
pine trees, very dry place
pine trees, very dry place
pine trees, very dry place
pine trees, very dry place
pine trees, very dry place
pine trees, very dry place
is xeric for th soils, soil photo suggest sub-xeric
is xeric for th soils, soil photo suggest sub-xeric
is xeric for th soils, soil photo suggest sub-xeric
is xeric for th soils, soil photo suggest sub-xeric
is xeric for th soils, soil photo suggest sub-xeric
is xeric for th soils, soil photo suggest sub-xeric
but close to mesic, but organic layer is thin, the soil photo is showing a in between class
but close to mesic, but organic layer is thin, the soil photo is showing a in between class
but close to mesic, but organic layer is thin, the soil photo is showing a in between class
but close to mesic, but organic layer is thin, the soil photo is showing a in between class
but close to mesic, but organic layer is thin, the soil photo is showing a in between class
but close to mesic, but organic layer is thin, the soil photo is showing a in between class
on top of Raja
on top of Raja
on top of Raja
on top of Raja
on top of Raja
on top of Raja
mesic side
mesic side
mesic side
mesic side
mesic side
mesic side
but more on the dry side, soil photo is clearly on the sub-xeric (not wet), nutrient rich?
but more on the dry side, soil photo is clearly on the sub-xeric (not wet), nutrient rich?
but more on the dry side, soil photo is clearly on the sub-xeric (not wet), nutrient rich?
but more on the dry side, soil photo is clearly on the sub-xeric (not wet), nutrient rich?
but more on the dry side, soil photo is clearly on the sub-xeric (not wet), nutrient rich?
but more on the dry side, soil photo is clearly on the sub-xeric (not wet), nutrient rich?
saprolite soil, very close to peat, but no peat.
saprolite soil, very close to peat, but no peat.
saprolite soil, very close to peat, but no peat.
saprolite soil, very close to peat, but no peat.
saprolite soil, very close to peat, but no peat.
saprolite soil, very close to peat, but no peat.
maybe sub-xeric, pit-dielectric is notably higher than surface dielectrics. Maybe thins sand layer ontop? -> close to shore line, soil photo says for sure mesic, but organic layer is not thick enough for peat yet
maybe sub-xeric, pit-dielectric is notably higher than surface dielectrics. Maybe thins sand layer ontop? -> close to shore line, soil photo says for sure mesic, but organic layer is not thick enough for peat yet
maybe sub-xeric, pit-dielectric is notably higher than surface dielectrics. Maybe thins sand layer ontop? -> close to shore line, soil photo says for sure mesic, but organic layer is not thick enough for peat yet
maybe sub-xeric, pit-dielectric is notably higher than surface dielectrics. Maybe thins sand layer ontop? -> close to shore line, soil photo says for sure mesic, but organic layer is not thick enough for peat yet
maybe sub-xeric, pit-dielectric is notably higher than surface dielectrics. Maybe thins sand layer ontop? -> close to shore line, soil photo says for sure mesic, but organic layer is not thick enough for peat yet
maybe sub-xeric, pit-dielectric is notably higher than surface dielectrics. Maybe thins sand layer ontop? -> close to shore line, soil photo says for sure mesic, but organic layer is not thick enough for peat yet
but more on the dry side, backed up by soil photo
but more on the dry side, backed up by soil photo
but more on the dry side, backed up by soil photo
but more on the dry side, backed up by soil photo
but more on the dry side, backed up by soil photo
but more on the dry side, backed up by soil photo
could also be xeric, small ridge, confirmed by photos, but very close, soil photo confirms sub-xeric
could also be xeric, small ridge, confirmed by photos, but very close, soil photo confirms sub-xeric
could also be xeric, small ridge, confirmed by photos, but very close, soil photo confirms sub-xeric
could also be xeric, small ridge, confirmed by photos, but very close, soil photo confirms sub-xeric
could also be xeric, small ridge, confirmed by photos, but very close, soil photo confirms sub-xeric
could also be xeric, small ridge, confirmed by photos, but very close, soil photo confirms sub-xeric
confirmed by soil photo
confirmed by soil photo
confirmed by soil photo
confirmed by soil photo
confirmed by soil photo
confirmed by soil photo
but could also be sub-xeric heath forest, soil photo has pit water, definitely mesic. Very dark B-horizon, no peat. Could be an outlier point
but could also be sub-xeric heath forest, soil photo has pit water, definitely mesic. Very dark B-horizon, no peat. Could be an outlier point
but could also be sub-xeric heath forest, soil photo has pit water, definitely mesic. Very dark B-horizon, no peat. Could be an outlier point
but could also be sub-xeric heath forest, soil photo has pit water, definitely mesic. Very dark B-horizon, no peat. Could be an outlier point
but could also be sub-xeric heath forest, soil photo has pit water, definitely mesic. Very dark B-horizon, no peat. Could be an outlier point
but could also be sub-xeric heath forest, soil photo has pit water, definitely mesic. Very dark B-horizon, no peat. Could be an outlier point
but could also be sub-xeric heath forest, soil photo definitely mesic, most likely it is also nutrient rich
but could also be sub-xeric heath forest, soil photo definitely mesic, most likely it is also nutrient rich
but could also be sub-xeric heath forest, soil photo definitely mesic, most likely it is also nutrient rich
but could also be sub-xeric heath forest, soil photo definitely mesic, most likely it is also nutrient rich
but could also be sub-xeric heath forest, soil photo definitely mesic, most likely it is also nutrient rich
but could also be sub-xeric heath forest, soil photo definitely mesic, most likely it is also nutrient rich